Skip to main content

    This website presents a public policy proposal. It is not law, regulation, or an official government publication.

    Policy Comparison

    Why the Employment Compliance Identifier Solves the Asylum Backlog

    Separating humanitarian protection from labor participation restores system integrity and reduces adjudication volume.

    Macro Context

    The Migration Reality

    53.3M

    Peak immigrant population in 2025

    1st

    First negative net migration in 50 years

    750K

    Workers lost from the labor force

    Immigrant Population Trend — 2025

    Jan '25Feb '25Mar '25Apr '25May '25Jun '2548M50M52M54M

    Policy disruptions have produced the first sustained population decline among immigrants in half a century.

    System Constraint

    3.9 Million

    Pending Asylum Cases

    0M0.9M1.8M3.5MEOIR CourtCasesUSCISAffirmative

    The system processes protection claims and labor participation through the same channel.

    Incentive Analysis

    How Each Model Processes Cases

    Current EAD Model

    File asylum application
    Wait 180+ days
    Receive work permit (EAD)
    Case remains in backlog

    ECI Model

    Withdraw asylum application
    Receive ECI
    Work legally with compliance
    Case removed from docket

    Administrative workload vs. administrative resolution

    Structural Comparison

    EAD vs. ECI — Category Comparison

    CategoryEAD (Current)ECI (Proposed)
    PurposeAuthorize employment during asylum pendencyAuthorize employment upon voluntary asylum withdrawal
    Legal Basis8 CFR 274a.12(c)(8)8 CFR 274a (proposed compliance track)
    Effect on BacklogNo reduction — case remains pendingDirect reduction — case removed from docket
    Employment MechanismPermits work while case is adjudicatedPermits work upon compliance enrollment
    Status GrantedTemporary work authorizationEmployment compliance identifier
    DurationRenewable during pendencyRenewable based on compliance
    Employer VerificationStandard I-9Enhanced employer-linked verification
    Compliance MonitoringNoneEmployer reporting + tax compliance
    Pathway to ResidenceNone inherentPossible via employer sponsorship
    Case ResolutionMust be adjudicatedResolved at enrollment

    Work Authorization Restrictions Do Not Reduce Cases

    Government must still adjudicate pending asylum applications regardless of employment eligibility. Removing or restricting work permits changes the applicant's economic condition but does not change the administrative obligation to process the case.

    Work permit removed
    Case removed

    Only voluntary withdrawal or completed adjudication removes a case from the docket.

    Objections Addressed

    Common Questions

    Compliance Pathway

    From Temporary Compliance to Long-Term Work Authorization

    Many applicants worry that leaving the asylum process means losing stability. The ECI program is designed to do the opposite: it replaces uncertainty with a predictable path.

    Stage 1 — Employment Compliance (ECI Period)

    After voluntarily withdrawing the asylum case and passing identity and background verification, the person receives an Employment Compliance Identifier (ECI).

    Work legally
    Maintain payroll or contract reporting
    Accumulate at least 600 days of employment within 2 years
    Pay required taxes
    Remain law-abiding
    Life events considered

    No penalties apply in cases of:

    • Serious illness
    • Verified inability to work
    • Death

    The goal is participation, not punishment.

    Stage 2 — Standard Work Authorization (EAD + Travel Card)

    After completing the compliance period, the temporary identifier converts into a standard Employment Authorization Document (EAD) with travel authorization.

    5-year work authorization
    Permission to leave and reenter the United States (combo card)
    Renewable for another 5 years if taxes are paid and no crimes are committed

    This follows the same multi-year EAD validity periods the government already issues today.

    Why This Reduces Risk

    Wait years
    Work authorization begins immediately
    Status depends on court backlog
    Status depends on compliance
    Unpredictable outcome
    Predictable progression

    Simple Comparison

    Current SystemECI System
    TimelineWait years for a decisionFollow a defined timeline
    Status basisDepends on court backlogDepends on compliance
    OutcomeUnpredictablePredictable progression
    Case resolutionCase remains pendingCase resolved immediately

    Participate, comply, transition.

    Economic Outcomes

    Projected System Impact

    Backlog Reduction

    Month 0Month 3Month 6Month 9Month 121M1.9M2.8M4.5M

    3.9M → 1.85M in 12 months

    Tax Revenue Impact

    LowModerateHigh$0B$40B$80B$120B$160B$40B$80B$137B

    $40B–$137B additional annual revenue

    Labor Market Distribution

    SectorSplit
    Construction 28%
    Agriculture 22%
    Services 32%
    Other 18%

    Compliance-based employment formalization produces measurable fiscal gains through payroll tax capture, reduces administrative adjudication costs, and redirects labor supply into documented, employer-verified positions across high-demand sectors.

    System-Wide Benefits

    Faster Protection Decisions

    Removing non-protection cases frees adjudicators to process genuine refugee claims with reduced wait times.

    Fewer Court Hearings

    Voluntary withdrawals eliminate the need for master calendar and individual merit hearings on those cases.

    Correct Legal Pathways

    Labor-motivated applicants move into employment-based compliance instead of occupying protection-based channels.

    Higher Tax Compliance

    Employer-linked verification ensures full payroll reporting and increases federal and state revenue accuracy.

    A Structural Solution, Not a Waiting Policy

    The ECI converts a waiting-based system into a compliance-based system. The result is measurable backlog reduction rather than conditional deterrence.

    Questions About This Proposal?

    We welcome questions, feedback, and collaboration from researchers, policymakers, and the public.