Skip to main content

    This website presents a public policy proposal. It is not law, regulation, or an official government publication.

    Policy Proposals

    This page summarizes a set of administrative reform concepts intended to address structural inefficiencies in the U.S. immigration system. Each proposal focuses on behavioral incentives, administrative workload, and statutory compatibility.

    The proposals below are designed to operate within executive-branch regulatory authority whenever possible, minimizing reliance on new legislation while preserving congressional intent. The objective is not to expand or restrict immigration numerically, but to improve how existing law is applied and enforced.

    Problem

    Current unlawful presence bars create a structural paradox: individuals eligible for lawful pathways often cannot use them because leaving the United States triggers multi-year reentry penalties.

    • Many remain in temporary or humanitarian processes simply to avoid triggering the bar
    • This inflates asylum filings and prolongs administrative backlog unrelated to protection claims
    • The bar does not always deter presence — it deters departure

    Proposed Administrative Mechanism

    Create a voluntary compliance track allowing eligible non-criminal individuals to enter an Employment Compliance Identifier (ECI) status instead of triggering the reentry bar. Participants would:

    • Register identity and background
    • Withdraw pending humanitarian filings if applicable
    • Work legally and pay taxes
    • Maintain compliance

    The bar would be conditionally waived upon enrollment.

    Expected Outcome

    This changes the incentive structure from avoidance behavior to cooperative compliance.

    • Reduces non-protection asylum filings
    • Improves identity visibility
    • Encourages voluntary participation in lawful systems
    • Preserves removal authority for non-compliance

    Problem

    The long-term childhood arrival population presents a persistent administrative challenge: individuals raised in the United States remain indefinitely in temporary enforcement discretion categories. This produces:

    • Recurring renewals
    • Litigation cycles
    • Unstable workforce participation
    • Ongoing uncertainty

    Proposed Administrative Approach

    Create a regulatory category under DHS supervised compliance authority. Eligibility factors:

    • Arrival as a minor
    • Continuous residence
    • Education or employment history
    • No criminal disqualifiers

    Participants transition from periodic deferred action to a renewable monitored employment authorization category similar to long-term parole-based presence structures already used in other contexts.

    Expected Outcome

    • Eliminates recurring adjudication cycles
    • Stabilizes workforce participation
    • Preserves congressional authority over permanent residence
    • Provides administrative consistency without statutory expansion

    Problem

    Immigration adjudication systems depend on predictable intake volume. Sharp increases in encounters produce cascading administrative consequences:

    • Asylum queue expansion
    • Court scheduling delays
    • Work authorization delays
    • Enforcement resource diversion

    Policy Observation

    Periods of lower encounter volume correlate with faster adjudication, fewer emergency policy measures, and improved officer allocation. Periods of surge intake produce backlog expansion regardless of rule changes.

    Administrative Principle

    Border predictability is not an enforcement goal alone; it is a processing capacity requirement.

    Proposed Direction

    Adopt intake-management mechanisms aligned with adjudicative capacity so regulatory changes affect behavior rather than react to volume.

    Problem

    Agricultural labor demand is seasonal, location-specific, and difficult to meet through traditional visa caps. Congress has already authorized agricultural visa frameworks, but administrative complexity limits effectiveness.

    Proposed Administrative Coordination

    Within existing statutory frameworks, DHS and the Department of Agriculture coordinate a sector-specific compliance registry:

    Workers

    • Register identity
    • Pass background screening
    • Work in verified agricultural employment

    Employers

    • Verify labor demand
    • Report payroll participation

    This is not a new visa classification but an operational adaptation using existing delegated authorities and employment verification structures.

    Expected Outcome

    • Stabilizes seasonal labor supply
    • Reduces unauthorized hiring incentives
    • Improves rural economic predictability
    • Reduces enforcement conflict between labor demand and immigration rules

    Problem

    Millions of individuals reside and work informally without contributing consistently to Social Security systems despite participating in the labor market. Simultaneously, long-term demographic trends increase financial pressure on retirement systems.

    Proposed Mechanism

    Create a voluntary compliance adjustment track. Eligible individuals must pass a clean background check, register for taxes, and maintain ongoing lawful employment.

    Participants contribute a fixed monthly payment (example: $200 per adult) directly designated toward Social Security funding in addition to payroll taxes. In return:

    • Renewable 5-year work authorization
    • Travel authorization eligibility
    • Continued compliance monitoring

    Purpose

    This program links lawful participation with measurable fiscal contribution rather than temporary tolerance.

    Expected Outcome

    • Expands contribution base to support retirement systems
    • Encourages transition from informal to formal economy
    • Improves identity accountability
    • Maintains enforcement authority for violations

    Guiding Framework

    Across different issues — asylum backlog, childhood arrivals, agricultural labor, and undocumented workforce participation — the same structural principle appears: systems function best when incentives align with legal categories.

    When legal pathways conflict with real-world behavior, individuals remain in temporary or informal conditions and administrative backlog expands. When participation is structured, monitored, and predictable, compliance increases and adjudicative workload decreases.

    These proposals prioritize

    • Compliance over avoidance
    • Registration over invisibility
    • Predictable authorization over repeated temporary relief
    • Administrative efficiency over reactive policy cycles

    The goal of these proposals is not to redefine immigration policy outcomes, but to improve administrative execution so that existing law can be applied consistently and efficiently across varying national conditions. A functional system benefits enforcement, humanitarian protection, economic stability, and public confidence simultaneously.

    Questions About This Proposal?

    We welcome questions, feedback, and collaboration from researchers, policymakers, and the public.